Position Paper
EU–INC’s position on Brussels’ proposal.
After two years of campaigning and 26,000 signatures, the Commission published a proposal for a corporate legal framework this March (COM(2026) 321) – and named it after our campaign. A big moment.
But a name isn't a standard, so we went through it bit by bit to make sure it creates one.
This position paper covers what the proposal does and doesn't do, what needs to stay in, and what we're asking for. It was developed by the EU-INC team with legal input from Dentons, Orrick and other legal experts across Europe.
The FAQ below covers the most common questions about the proposal and our position.
Free choice of registration seat — the make-or-break clause
The four things we need from this regulation
How to set up an EU-INC in practice
Tax: what changes, what doesn’t, and how to address forum shopping concerns
Employment law and worker representation
Anti-abuse safeguards, KYC/AML, and the central registry
A glossary of key terms
ABOUT EU–INC
01
What is EU–INC?
A grassroots policy solution advocating for a standard corporate form for startups. After one and a half years of campaigning, the EU Commission announced its solution proposal. Confusingly also named “EU Inc”.
02
Are you a part of the Commission and its work unit?
No, the EU–INC campaign is a grassroots effort by the European startup ecosystem. Spearheaded by a small core team. And supported by the who’s who of European startups. We worked on an in-depth legal proposal on how to implement EU–INC, developed together with leading startup law firms in Europe. You can still read it here. We advised the Commission over the last year, but they ultimately went with a different approach that aims for the same outcome. Instead of introducing a new regime they allow founders/investors to converge around a few standard countries.
03
Why are standards needed for startups?
Less than 18% of first-round European investments are pan-European due to legal system complexity. The initiative would standardize investment processes, unify the ecosystem, harmonize stock options, simplify cross-border employment, and position Europe as a leading innovation hub. Our founders need to compete globally from day one. They should be able to raise money globally from day one.
04
How likely is this to succeed?
Political leaders, including Mario Draghi, Ursula von der Leyen, and Enrico Letta have expressed support. It’s currently in a feedback and voting phase with the Commission. Success isn’t getting the law written, but ensuring it’s actually useful. For this, we require community mobilization to demonstrate that this is the priority solution.
05
How can I help?
Help us ensure everyone in the tech, startup and policy ecosystem knows about EU–INC – founders, investors, politicians, press, national startup associations, and policy groups. Support us on Twitter/X and LinkedIn, and share our updates and news. Write about the critical necessity of EU–INC and an ambitious implementation of Brussels’ current proposal. The next phase really matters. We need to get the details right. Our logo and social media images are available here. You want to make Europe a better place for startups? This is our chance.
06
I’m a policymaker and would like to help
EU–INC has already reached the European Commission. Now Brussels’ proposal moves into negotiations between the Council and Parliament. Policy makers, MEPs, ministry officials, and national startup associations can make a real difference in the next few months. Talk to your colleagues. Push for free choice of registration seat. Don’t let the one clause that makes this useful get removed. Reach out to the policy team at policy@eu-inc.org.
07
Why aren’t existing company structures suitable for startups?
Current EU structures like the European Company (SE) impose high capital requirements, complex formation processes, and administrative burdens that are unsuitable for startups.
WHAT WE ARE ASKING FOR
01
Protect free choice of registration seat
This is the core mechanism behind this European “Delaware moment”. It is the one thing that makes the EU Commission's proposal a potential solution for the tech sector. The seat of registration is essential to create a real standard. A company should be able to incorporate in one Member State and use that standard to fundraise, operate, hire, and pay taxes in another country without reincorporating to scale every time. All of this is already within European law. The proposal just enables it properly. The promise by President von der Leyen was not “simplification”. The promise was standardization.
02
Build a central EU registry
A real EU–INC needs: one modern digital registry with strong KYC and AML standards to avoid bypassing local standards and enforce transparent beneficial ownership, 48-hour incorporation, and one-click bank account creation. This ensures we can do fully digital processes without worrying that some Member States’ weaker standards can be used to sidestep stricter rules in others. This also means countries would have no need to manually verify those digital standards through service providers or notaries. It would also enable founders to open bank accounts with one click and dramatically reduce the paperwork of funding rounds (e.g., no need to resubmit every KYC document at every round).
03
Keep EU–INC open to all companies
There should not be any limit to who can use the entity. Our goal is new GDP-driving companies. And founders and markets decide what innovation looks like. Not politicians. Not legal proposals. Any artificial size caps or revenue thresholds would force successful companies back into legacy national structures exactly when they begin scaling. This would cause uncertainty for founders and investors and jeopardise the international credibility of such a structure. Delaware does not ask how big or clever your company is to act as infrastructure for you. Neither should Europe’s alternative.
04
Keep employment and taxes local
The goal of our EU–INC campaign is not to avoid local obligations. It's not meant as a tax loophole. Taxes follow where the company operates and is administered, not where it is registered. The registration seat does not override national tax rules. EU–INC does not aim to replace local employment law. Employment law follows the country where employees work, not where the company is registered. If you hire in Germany, German labor law applies to these workers. If you hire in Poland, Polish labor law applies. Neither should Polish law apply to German workers, nor the other way around. No matter where you are incorporated. Therefore, for example, German co-determination applies to employees in Germany, even if the EU-INC is registered in Estonia. Conversely, employees in other countries are not subject to the authority of German employees or their worker council.
IMPRINT
contact@eu-inc.org
policy@eu-inc.org
eu-inc.org · Factory Lisbon
Av. Infante Dom Henrique 143
1950-406 Lisboa, Portugal
LEARN MORE
We put together a legal gap analysis with global law firm Dentons (pdf) and our very own position paper (LINK) covering every question about the proposal.